slicc: added generic mach to mach function
Review Request #1623 - Created Jan. 14, 2013 and updated
| Information | |
|---|---|
| Derek Hower | |
| gem5 | |
| default | |
| Reviewers | |
| Default | |
Changeset 9469:e47b15566f66 --------------------------- slicc: added generic mach to mach function *Note* This patch was created by Brad Beckmann (Brad.Beckmann@amd.com)
Issue Summary
1
1
0
0
| Description | From | Last Updated | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debugging statement? Or is this used for something else? | Jason Lowe-Power | Jan. 16, 2013, 6:33 a.m. | Open |
Posted (Jan. 16, 2013, 6:33 a.m.)
Is there exactly a one-to-one relationship between GenericMachineType and MachineType? If so, why do we have both? I have a patch that I haven't put on reviewboard (which I should) that allows two different MachineType's to have the same GenericMachineType. This function, convertGenericMachToMach, would break that. But maybe I'm just confused as to what GenericMachineType is supposed to be. Could you explain what the difference between MachineType and GenericMachineType and when to use them?
-
src/mem/slicc/symbols/Type.py (Diff revision 1) -
Debugging statement? Or is this used for something else?