Review Board 2.0.15


Fixed an LSQ full check condition at rename.

Review Request #693 - Created May 13, 2011 and updated

Information
Yasuko Eckert
gem5
Reviewers
Default
ali, gblack, nate, stever
O3: Fixed an LSQ full check condition at rename.

   
Posted (May 15, 2011, 2:09 a.m.)
This seems OK, but could you describe in more detail what this patch does and why it's necessary? What problems does it fix? How do the problems manifest themselves? 

Thanks,
Ali
Ship it!
Posted (July 15, 2013, 8:22 a.m.)
It seems like the old code was being very cautious and limiting the number of loads that could be sent to the lsq to the current free - the number dispatched. This change seems to actually check how many memory references were dispatched. It makes sense. Anyone have any thoughts about committing it?