alpha: naming for dtb faults
Review Request #741 - Created June 8, 2011 and submitted
| Information | |
|---|---|
| Korey Sewell | |
| gem5 | |
| default | |
| Reviewers | |
| Default | |
| ali, gblack, nate, stever | |
alpha: naming for dtb faults Just "dfault" gets confusing while debugging. Why not differentiate whether it's an access violation or page fault
Posted (June 9, 2011, 4:14 a.m.)
This seems reasonable to me, but we should consider if the old name was the actual name given by the architecture. I'm not that familiar with Alpha so I have no idea. If it was, then you could do something like "dfault (paging)" and "dfault (perm)" or similar and preserve the old name for the sake of looking things up in a manual.